Studying Double Charm Decays of B_{u,d} and B_{s} Mesons in the MSSM with R-parity Violation
C. S. Kim, Ru-Min Wang, Ya-Dong Yang

TL;DR
This paper investigates how R-parity violating supersymmetry could influence double charm B meson decays, constraining parameters with current data and exploring potential effects on CP asymmetries, aiding future experimental searches.
Contribution
It derives bounds on R-parity violating couplings from experimental data and analyzes their impact on CP asymmetries in B meson decays, highlighting potential large effects on mixing-induced asymmetries.
Findings
R-parity violating effects could be very large on mixing-induced CP asymmetries.
Effects on direct CP asymmetries are insufficient to explain Belle's large observed CP violation.
Constraints on R-parity violating couplings are consistent with current measurements.
Abstract
Motivated by the possible large direct CP asymmetry of \bar{B}^0_d \to D^+ D^- decay measured by Belle collaboration, we investigate double charm B_{u,d} and B_s decays in the minimal supersymmetric standard model with R-parity violation. We derive the bounds on relevant R-parity violating couplings from the current experimental data, which show quite consistent measurements among relative collaborations. Using the constrained parameter spaces, we explore R-parity violating effects on other observables in these decays, which have not been measured or have not been well measured yet. We find that the R-parity violating effects on the mixing-induced CP asymmetries of \bar{B}^0_d \to D^{(*)+} D^{(*)-} and \bar{B}^0_s \to D^{(*)+}_s D^{(*)-}_s decays could be very large, nevertheless the R-parity violating effects on the direct CP asymmetries could not be large enough to explain the large…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
