Dynamic splitting of Gaussian pencil beams in heterogeneity-correction algorithms for radiotherapy with heavy charged particles
Nobuyuki Kanematsu, Masataka Komori, Shunsuke Yonai, Azusa Ishizaki

TL;DR
This paper introduces a dynamic Gaussian beam splitting method based on self-similarity to improve dose calculation accuracy in heterogeneity-corrected heavy charged particle radiotherapy, addressing limitations of traditional pencil-beam models.
Contribution
It presents a novel self-similar Gaussian beam splitting technique that enhances accuracy and efficiency in heterogeneity-corrected radiotherapy dose calculations.
Findings
Successfully reproduces detour effects in carbon-ion experiments.
Splitting calculations are about five times slower than non-splitting methods.
Method is accurate, efficient, and adaptable for various pencil-beam algorithms.
Abstract
The pencil-beam model is valid only when elementary Gaussian beams are small enough with respect to lateral heterogeneity of a medium, which is not always the case in heavy charged particle radiotherapy. This work addresses a solution for this problem by applying our discovery of self-similar nature of Gaussian distributions. In this method, Gaussian beams split into narrower and deflecting daughter beams when their size has exceeded the lateral heterogeneity limit. They will be automatically arranged with modulated areal density for accurate and efficient dose calculations. The effectiveness was assessed in an carbon-ion beam experiment in presence of steep range compensation, where the splitting calculation reproduced the detour effect of imperfect compensation amounting up to about 10% or as large as the lateral particle disequilibrium effect. The efficiency was analyzed in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
