Different representations for the action principle in 4D N = 2 supergravity
Sergei M. Kuzenko, Gabriele Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli

TL;DR
This paper compares two methods for reducing superfield actions to component form in 4D N=2 supergravity, highlighting a novel approach that preserves all gauge symmetries and deriving new results like the superfield c-map.
Contribution
It introduces a gauge-symmetry-preserving component reduction method and develops a normal coordinate approach applicable to any supergravity theory.
Findings
Derived the superfield c-map from supergravity.
Developed differential equations for vielbein and connection in normal coordinates.
Reconstructed superdeterminant without detailed vielbein knowledge.
Abstract
Within the superspace formulation for four-dimensional N = 2 matter-coupled supergravity developed in arXiv:0805.4683, we elaborate two approaches to reduce the superfield action to components. One of them is based on the principle of projective invariance which is a purely N = 2 concept having no analogue in simple supergravity. In this approach, the component reduction of the action is performed without imposing any Wess-Zumino gauge condition, that is by keeping intact all the gauge symmetries of the superfield action, including the super-Weyl invariance. As a simple application, the c-map is derived for the first time from superfield supergravity. Our second approach to component reduction is based on the method of normal coordinates around a submanifold in a curved superspace, which we develop in detail. We derive differential equations which are obeyed by the vielbein and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
