Evolution in the properties of Lyman-alpha emitters from redshifts z ~ 3 to z ~ 2
Kim K. Nilsson (1), Christian Tapken (1), Palle Moeller (2), Wolfram, Freudling (2), Johan P.U. Fynbo (3), Klaus Meisenheimer (1), Peter Laursen, (3), Goeran Oestlin (4) ((1) MPIA Heidelberg, (2) ESO Garching, (3) Dark, Cosmology Centre, (4) Stockholm Observatory)

TL;DR
This study compares the properties of Lyman-alpha emitters at redshifts around 3 and 2.25, revealing evolutionary trends such as increased dust, AGN activity, and more evolved galaxy characteristics at lower redshift.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of LAE properties between z ~ 3 and z = 2.25, highlighting significant evolutionary changes in their spectral energy distributions and AGN contribution.
Findings
LAEs at z=2.25 have broader SEDs and more AGN activity.
Equivalent widths of Ly-alpha are narrower at z=2.25.
Star formation rates are lower at z=2.25, indicating more quiescent galaxies.
Abstract
Context: Narrow-band surveys for Ly-alpha emitters (LAEs) is a powerful tool in detecting high, and very high, redshift galaxies. Even though samples are growing at redshifts z = 3 - 6, the nature of these galaxies is still poorly known. Aims: To study the properties of z = 2.25 LAEs and compare those with the properties of z > 3 LAEs. Methods: We present narrow-band imaging made with the MPG/ESO 2.2m telescope with the WFI detector. We have made a selection for emission-line objects and find 170 candidate typical LAEs and 17 candidates which we regard as high UV-transmission LAEs. We have derived the magnitudes of these objects in 8 bands from u* to Ks, and studied if they have X-ray and/or radio counterparts. Results: We show that there has been significant evolution in the properties of LAEs between redshift z ~ 3 and z = 2.25. The spread in spectral energy distributions (SEDs) at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
