Collapse Barriers and Halo Abundance: Testing the Excursion Set Ansatz
Brant Robertson (KICP/UChicago), Andrey Kravtsov (KICP/UChicago),, Jeremy Tinker (KICP/UChicago/BCCP/UCB), and Andrew Zentner (UPitt)

TL;DR
This paper tests the excursion set ansatz for predicting dark matter halo abundance using large-scale simulations, revealing inconsistencies and suggesting the need for improved models of halo collapse.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the standard collapse barrier models do not accurately predict halo mass functions, highlighting limitations of the excursion set approach.
Findings
Relation between overdensity and variance aligns with ellipsoidal collapse models.
Excursion set ansatz predicts halo mass functions inconsistent with simulations.
Highlights need for refined collapse models in analytical frameworks.
Abstract
Our heuristic understanding of the abundance of dark matter halos centers around the concept of a density threshold, or "barrier", for gravitational collapse. If one adopts the ansatz that regions of the linearly evolved density field smoothed on mass scale M with an overdensity that exceeds the barrier will undergo gravitational collapse into halos of mass M, the corresponding abundance of such halos can be estimated simply as a fraction of the mass density satisfying the collapse criterion divided by the mass M. The key ingredient of this ansatz is therefore the functional form of the collapse barrier as a function of mass M or, equivalently, of the variance sigma^2(M). Several such barriers based on the spherical, Zel'dovich, and ellipsoidal collapse models have been extensively discussed. Using large scale cosmological simulations, we show that the relation between the linear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
