Ground-based calibration and characterization of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor Detectors
Elisabetta Bissaldi (1), Andreas von Kienlin (1), Giselher G. Lichti, (1), Helmut Steinle (1), P. Narayana Bhat (2), Michael S. Briggs (2), Gerald, J. Fishman (3), Andrew S. Hoover (4), R. Marc Kippen (4), Michael Krumrey, (5), Martin Gerlach (5), Valerie Connaughton (2)

TL;DR
This paper details the ground-based calibration and characterization of the Fermi GBM detectors, essential for accurate gamma-ray burst detection and localization, through simulations supported by calibration measurements.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive calibration of the GBM detectors' response, including energy relation, resolution, and effective area, enhancing GRB measurement accuracy.
Findings
Detectors' energy response characterized across angles
Calibration improves accuracy of GRB localization
Effective area and resolution quantified for all detectors
Abstract
One of the scientific objectives of NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope is the study of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) was designed to detect and localize bursts for the Fermi mission. By means of an array of 12 NaI(Tl) (8 keV to 1 MeV) and two BGO (0.2 to 40 MeV) scintillation detectors, GBM extends the energy range (20 MeV to > 300 GeV) of Fermi's main instrument, the Large Area Telescope, into the traditional range of current GRB databases. The physical detector response of the GBM instrument to GRBs is determined with the help of Monte Carlo simulations, which are supported and verified by on-ground individual detector calibration measurements. We present the principal instrument properties, which have been determined as a function of energy and angle, including the channel-energy relation, the energy resolution, the effective area and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
