Is Quantum Logic a Logic?
Mladen Pavicic, Norman D. Megill

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that quantum logic is fundamentally similar to classical logic, both being axiomatic systems with different models, challenging the notion that quantum logic is uniquely non-classical.
Contribution
It introduces novel lattice models for quantum and classical logics that are non-orthomodular and non-distributive, showing their equivalence as logical systems.
Findings
Quantum logic and classical logic are both axiomatic deductive systems.
Novel lattice models reveal that orthomodularity and distributivity are not intrinsic to quantum and classical logics.
Semantics depend on models; quantum and classical logics differ more in their models than in their axioms.
Abstract
It is shown that quantum logic is a logic in the very same way in which classical logic is a logic. Soundness and completeness of both quantum and classical logics have been proved for novel lattice models that are not orthomodular and therefore cannot be distributive either - as opposed to the standard lattice models that are orthomodular and distributive for the respective logics. Hence, we cannot attribute the orthomodularity to quantum logic itself, and we cannot attribute the distributivity to classical logic itself. The valuations of logics with respect of novel models turn out to be non-numerical, and therefore truth values and truth tables cannot in general be ascribed to the propositions of logics themselves but only to the variables of some of their models -for example, the two-valued Boolean algebra. Logics are, first of all, axiomatic deductive systems, and if we stop short…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
