Approximating the least hypervolume contributor: NP-hard in general, but fast in practice
Karl Bringmann, Tobias Friedrich

TL;DR
This paper proves that calculating the exact hypervolume contribution is NP-hard, but introduces a fast probabilistic approximation algorithm that performs well on large datasets, enabling practical use in high-dimensional optimization.
Contribution
It establishes the NP-hardness of exact hypervolume contribution calculation and presents a fast approximation algorithm with probabilistic guarantees.
Findings
Exact calculation is #P-hard and NP-hard to approximate.
The proposed algorithm efficiently handles large, high-dimensional datasets.
The algorithm achieves near-optimal solutions within seconds on benchmark datasets.
Abstract
The hypervolume indicator is an increasingly popular set measure to compare the quality of two Pareto sets. The basic ingredient of most hypervolume indicator based optimization algorithms is the calculation of the hypervolume contribution of single solutions regarding a Pareto set. We show that exact calculation of the hypervolume contribution is #P-hard while its approximation is NP-hard. The same holds for the calculation of the minimal contribution. We also prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether a solution has the least hypervolume contribution. Even deciding whether the contribution of a solution is at most times the minimal contribution is NP-hard. This implies that it is neither possible to efficiently find the least contributing solution (unless ) nor to approximate it (unless ). Nevertheless, in the second part of the paper we present a fast…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
