Constraining the energy budget of GRB 080721
R.L.C. Starling (1), E. Rol (1,2), A.J. van der Horst (3), S.-C. Yoon, (4), V. Pal'shin, C. Ledoux, K.L. Page, J.P.U. Fynbo, K. Wiersema, N.R., Tanvir, P. Jakobsson, C. Guidorzi, P.A. Curran, A.J. Levan, P.T. O'Brien,, J.P. Osborne, D. Svinkin, A. de Ugarte Postigo, T. Oosting

TL;DR
This study analyzes the late-time optical and X-ray afterglow of GRB 080721 to constrain its jet opening angle and total energy, providing insights into the burst's progenitor and ruling out a magnetar origin.
Contribution
It provides the first tight constraints on the energy budget and jet opening angle of GRB 080721 based on extensive late-time observations.
Findings
Jet opening angle >= 7.3 degrees
Total energy >= 9.9 x 10^51 erg
Likely not from a magnetar progenitor
Abstract
We follow the bright, highly energetic afterglow of Swift-discovered GRB 080721 at z=2.591 out to 36 days or 3e6 s since the trigger in the optical and X-ray bands. We do not detect a break in the late-time light curve inferring a limit on the opening angle of theta_j >= 7.3 deg and setting tight constraints on the total energy budget of the burst of E_gamma >= 9.9e51 erg within the fireball model. To obey the fireball model closure relations the GRB jet must be expanding into a homogeneous surrounding medium and likely lies behind a significant column of dust. The energy constraint we derive can be used as observational input for models of the progenitors of long gamma-ray bursts: we discuss how such high collimation-corrected energies could be accommodated with certain parameters of the standard massive star core-collapse models. We can, however, most probably rule out a magnetar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
