Searle's "Dualism Revisited"
Henry P. Stapp
TL;DR
This paper critically examines John Searle's recent claims against dualism, analyzing the scientific validity of his arguments and exploring implications for the philosophy of mind.
Contribution
It provides a scientific critique of Searle's refutation of dualism, clarifying its strengths and weaknesses.
Findings
Searle's arguments have notable philosophical limitations.
The scientific perspective reveals gaps in Searle's refutation.
Implications for future dualism debates are discussed.
Abstract
A recent article in which John Searle claims to refute dualism is examined from a scientific perspective.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic Theory and Institutions · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Classical Philosophy and Thought