A Topological Phase in a Quantum Gravity Model
Michael H. Freedman

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges in defining topological phases, proposes a flexible approach, and identifies potential topological phases within a class of quantum gravity models that are neither lattice nor field theoretic.
Contribution
It introduces a simple class of quantum gravity models that may contain candidates for topological phases, highlighting the need for flexible definitions.
Findings
Identification of candidate topological phases in quantum gravity models
Discussion on the importance of flexible definitions of topological phases
Analysis of strengths and weaknesses of various definitions
Abstract
I would claim that we do not have a suitably general definition of what a topological phase is, or more importantly, any robust understanding of how to enter one even in the world of mathematical models. The latter is, of course, the more important issue and the main subject of this note. But a good definition can sharpen our thinking and a poor definition can misdirect us. I will not attempt a final answer here but merely comment on the strengths and weaknesses of possible definitions and argue for some flexibility. In particular, I describe a rather simple class of ``quantum gravity'' models which are neither lattice nor field theoretic but appear to contain strong candidates for topological phases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
