Protein-Interaction-Networks: More than mere modules
Stefan Pinkert, Joerg Schultz, Joerg Reichardt

TL;DR
This paper challenges the traditional view of modules in protein-interaction networks, proposing a novel network decomposition into functional roles that better captures biological structure and function.
Contribution
It introduces a new method for decomposing protein-interaction networks into functional roles, surpassing the traditional module-based approach.
Findings
Traditional modules miss important network structures
Functional role decomposition captures network function more effectively
Impacts protein function prediction methods
Abstract
Cellular function is widely believed to be organized in a modular fashion. On all scales and at all levels of complexity, relatively independent sub-units perform relatively independent sub-tasks of biological function. This functional modularity must be reflected in the topology of molecular networks. But how a functional module should be represented in an interaction network is an open question. In protein-interaction networks (PIN), one can identify a protein-complex as a module on a small scale, i.e. modules are understood as densely linked, resp. interacting, groups of proteins, that are only sparsely interacting with the rest of the network. In this contribution, we show that extrapolating this concept of cohesively linked clusters of proteins as modules to the scale of the entire PIN inevitable misses important and functionally relevant structure inherent in the network. As an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
