Constraints on a phenomenologically parameterized neutron-star equation of state
Jocelyn S. Read, Benjamin D. Lackey, Benjamin J. Owen, and John L., Friedman

TL;DR
This paper develops a simplified parameterized model for the neutron-star equation of state, enabling systematic constraints from astrophysical data, and demonstrates how specific measurements can tightly restrict the properties of dense matter.
Contribution
It introduces a three-parameter piecewise polytrope model for the neutron-star EOS that accurately approximates various candidate EOSs and discusses how observational data can constrain this parameter space.
Findings
A 3-parameter model matches candidate EOSs within 4% rms error below 1.4 solar masses.
Observations of massive stars and moment of inertia measurements can significantly constrain the EOS.
The paper provides an improved algorithm for stability analysis of neutron stars.
Abstract
We introduce a parameterized high-density equation of state (EOS) in order to systematize the study of constraints placed by astrophysical observations on the nature of neutron-star matter. To obtain useful constraints, the number of parameters should be smaller than the number of neutron-star properties that have been measured or will have been measured in the next several years. And the set must be large enough to accurately approximate the large set of candidate EOSs. We find that a parameterized EOS based on piecewise polytropes with 3 free parameters matches to about 4% rms error an extensive set of candidate EOSs at densities below the central density of 1.4 solar mass stars. Adding observations of more massive stars constrains the higher density part of the EOS and requires an additional parameter. We obtain constraints on the allowed parameter space set by causality and by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
