A new metric for robustness with respect to virus spread
Robert Kooij, Phillip Schumm, Caterina Scoglio

TL;DR
This paper introduces the viral conductance metric to evaluate network robustness against virus spread across all possible spreading rates, improving upon the epidemic threshold measure.
Contribution
It proposes a new robustness metric, viral conductance, that considers the entire range of spreading rates, unlike the traditional epidemic threshold.
Findings
Viral conductance varies significantly across different network types.
Regular graphs and bipartite graphs have distinct viral conductance profiles.
The metric provides a comprehensive robustness measure for realistic networks.
Abstract
The robustness of a network is depending on the type of attack we are considering. In this paper we focus on the spread of viruses on networks. It is common practice to use the epidemic threshold as a measure for robustness. Because the epidemic threshold is inversely proportional to the largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix, it seems easy to compare the robustness of two networks. We will show in this paper that the comparison of the robustness with respect to virus spread for two networks actually depends on the value of the effective spreading rate tau. For this reason we propose a new metric, the viral conductance, which takes into account the complete range of values tau can obtain. In this paper we determine the viral conductance of regular graphs, complete bi-partite graphs and a number of realistic networks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 epidemiological studies · Artificial Immune Systems Applications · Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
