Liquid-Drop and Independent-Particle Models Revisited
S. Afsar Abbas

TL;DR
This paper revisits nuclear models to show that the liquid-drop and independent-particle descriptions are fundamentally coexistent, providing a unified understanding of nuclear structure.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the liquid-drop and independent-particle phases of the nucleus are equally fundamental and coexist, challenging the traditional view of their distinct roles.
Findings
Liquid-drop and independent-particle models are fundamentally coexistent.
The difference in binding energy indicates simultaneous phases.
Both models are essential for a complete nuclear description.
Abstract
Traditionally, the difference in binding energy from the experimental value with respect to the theoretical liquid-drop model value, has been seen as indication of independent-particle character along with magicity for particular number of protons and neutrons. We study this carefully to demonstrate that it actually indicates that the liquid-drop and the independent-particle phases of the nucleus have equal fundamental primacy and coexist simultaneously in a nucleus to provide a complete and a consistent description of the same.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
