Reply to Comment [arXiv:0810.3244v1] by R.S. Decca et al. on "Contribution of drifting carriers to the Casimir-Lifshitz and Casimir-Polder interactions with semiconductor materials"
Diego A. R. Dalvit, Steve K. Lamoreaux
TL;DR
This paper refutes claims made in a comment regarding their previous work on the contribution of drifting carriers to Casimir interactions with semiconductors, asserting the comment's inaccuracies and inconsistency with fundamental physics principles.
Contribution
It provides a rebuttal demonstrating that the claims in the comment are incorrect and contradict basic principles of statistical physics.
Findings
The comment's claims are incorrect.
The original analysis aligns with statistical physics.
The rebuttal clarifies the role of drifting carriers.
Abstract
We show that the claims expressed in the Comment arXiv:0810.3244v1 by R.S. Decca et al against our paper, D.A.R. Dalvit and S.K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163203 (2008), are wrong and manifestly inconsistent with basic principles of statistical physics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect