Instabilities in the Aether
Sean M. Carroll, Timothy R. Dulaney, Moira I. Gresham, and Heywood Tam

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the stability of Lorentz-violating theories with a fixed-norm vector field, identifying only three stable kinetic terms and discussing their stability conditions and evolution obstacles.
Contribution
It classifies stable kinetic terms for aether models and clarifies conditions under which these theories are physically viable.
Findings
Only three kinetic terms are free of manifest instabilities.
Timelike sigma-model is stable with a fixed norm constraint.
Maxwell and scalar models are perturbatively stable but have evolution issues.
Abstract
We investigate the stability of theories in which Lorentz invariance is spontaneously broken by fixed-norm vector "aether" fields. Models with generic kinetic terms are plagued either by ghosts or by tachyons, and are therefore physically unacceptable. There are precisely three kinetic terms that are not manifestly unstable: a sigma model , the Maxwell Lagrangian , and a scalar Lagrangian . The timelike sigma-model case is well-defined and stable when the vector norm is fixed by a constraint; however, when it is determined by minimizing a potential there is necessarily a tachyonic ghost, and therefore an instability. In the Maxwell and scalar cases, the Hamiltonian is unbounded below, but at the level of perturbation theory there are fewer degrees of freedom and the models are stable. However, in these two theories…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
