Multi-Field Inflation on the Landscape

TL;DR

This paper explores a broad class of multi-field inflation models with staggered field decay, providing a generalized analytic framework, and finds that linear potentials fit observations well while hilltop potentials are nearly ruled out.

Contribution

It introduces a generalized analytic approach to staggered multi-field inflation, demonstrating its viability and observational consistency with specific potential choices.

Findings

Linear potentials are in excellent agreement with WMAP5 data.

Hilltop potentials are borderline ruled out at 2σ level.

Decay of fields significantly influences inflationary observables.

Abstract

We examine a wide class of multi-field inflationary models based on fields that decay or stabilize during inflation in a staggered fashion. The fields driving assisted inflation are on flat, short stretches, before they encounter a sharp drop; whenever a field encounters such a drop due to its slow roll evolution, its energy is transferred to other degrees of freedom, i.e. radiation. The rate at which fields decay is determined dynamically and it is not a free parameter in this class of models. To compute observables, we generalize the analytic framework of staggered inflation, allowing for more general initial conditions and varying potentials. By searching for generic situations arising on the landscape, we arrive at a setup involving linear or hilltop potentials and evenly spread out initial field values. This scenario is not more fine tuned than large-field models, despite the fact that many more degrees of freedom are involved. Further, the $\eta$-problem can be alleviated. The additional decrease of the potential energy caused by the decay of fields provides leading order contribution to observables, such as the scalar and tensor spectral index or the tensor to scalar ratio, for which we derive general expressions. We compare the predictions with WMAP5 constraints and find that hilltop potentials are borderline ruled out at the $2\sigma$-level, while linear potentials are in excellent agreement with observations. We further comment on additional sources of gravitational waves and non-Gaussianities that could serve as a smoking gun for staggered inflation.