An evaluation of Bradfordizing effects
Philipp Mayr

TL;DR
This paper evaluates Bradfordizing, a bibliometric method, for improving information retrieval by re-ranking core scientific documents across multiple disciplines, demonstrating significant relevance improvements in digital libraries.
Contribution
It provides a systematic evaluation of Bradfordizing's effectiveness in re-ranking core documents in diverse scientific fields using controlled experiments.
Findings
Bradfordizing effectively re-ranks core documents in digital libraries.
Relevance of core documents is significantly higher after Bradfordizing.
Statistical tests confirm the significance of relevance improvements.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to apply and evaluate the bibliometric method Bradfordizing for information retrieval (IR) experiments. Bradfordizing is used for generating core document sets for subject-specific questions and to reorder result sets from distributed searches. The method will be applied and tested in a controlled scenario of scientific literature databases from social and political sciences, economics, psychology and medical science (SOLIS, SoLit, USB Koeln Opac, CSA Sociological Abstracts, World Affairs Online, Psyndex and Medline) and 164 standardized topics. An evaluation of the method and its effects is carried out in two laboratory-based information retrieval experiments (CLEF and KoMoHe) using a controlled document corpus and human relevance assessments. The results show that Bradfordizing is a very robust method for re-ranking the main document types (journal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior
