Representation dimension of extensions of hereditary algebras
Manuel Saorin

TL;DR
This paper investigates the representation dimension of certain algebra extensions, establishing upper bounds under specific conditions related to the hereditary algebra's type and module properties.
Contribution
It provides new bounds on the representation dimension of triangular matrix algebras derived from hereditary algebras, depending on algebra type and module characteristics.
Findings
Representation dimension ≤ 3 under finite type conditions
Bound holds for tame hereditary algebras with specific modules
No self-extensions in modules implies the bound
Abstract
We show that if H is a hereditary finite dimensional algebra, M is a finitely generated H-module and B is a semisimple subalgebra of the endomorphism algebra of M, then the representation dimension of the corresponding triangular matrix algebra is less or equal to 3 whenever one of the following conditions hold: i) H is of finite representation type; ii) H is tame and M is a direct sum of regular and preprojective modules; iii) M has no self-extensions
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
