Comparison of crystal structures and effects of Co substitution in a new member of Fe-1111 superconductor family AeFeAsF(Ae = Ca and Sr): a possible candidate for higher Tc superconductor
Takatoshi Nomura, Yasunori Inoue, Satoru Matsuishi, Masahiro Hirano,, Jung Eun Kim, Kenichi Kato, Masaki Takata, Hideo Hosono

TL;DR
This study refines the crystal structures of CaFeAsF and SrFeAsF with Co substitution, revealing structural changes and phase transition behaviors that suggest CaFeAsF as a promising candidate for higher-temperature superconductivity.
Contribution
The paper provides detailed structural analysis of Co-doped CaFeAsF and SrFeAsF, linking atomic radii mismatches to tetrahedral distortions and phase transition suppression, proposing CaFeAsF as a potential high-Tc superconductor.
Findings
Structural phase transitions occur at ~120 K for CaFeAsF and ~180 K for SrFeAsF.
Co substitution suppresses structural phase transitions below 100 K.
Larger Sr radius flattens FeAs4 tetrahedron, smaller Ca radius makes it more regular.
Abstract
We refined crystal structures of newly found members of the Fe-1111 superconductor family, CaFe\_{1-x}Co\_{x}AsF and SrFe\_{1-x}Co\_{x}AsF (x = 0, 0.06, 0.12) by powder synchrotron X-ray diffraction analysis. The tetragonal to orthorhombic phase transitions were observed at ~120 K for unsubstituted CaFeAsF and at ~180 K for unsubstituted SrFeAsF, the transition temperatures agreeing with kinks observed in temperature-dependent resistivity curves. Although the transition temperature decreases, the structural phase transitions were observed below 100 K in both samples of x = 0.06, and finally they were suppressed in the doping level of x = 0.12. The refined structures reveal that distortions of the FeAs4 tetrahedron from the regular tetrahedron likely originate from mismatches in atomic radii among the constituent elements. In this system, the enlarged FeAs4 tetrahedron resulting from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
