Randomized benchmarking and process tomography for gate errors in a solid-state qubit
J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, L. Tornberg, Jens Koch, Lev S. Bishop, A., A. Houck, B. R. Johnson, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf

TL;DR
This paper compares different methods for measuring single-qubit gate errors in a superconducting qubit, revealing that decoherence limits gate fidelity and providing a detailed analysis of error sources.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive comparison of quantum process tomography and randomized benchmarking for assessing gate errors in solid-state qubits.
Findings
Randomized benchmarking shows a minimum average gate error of 1.1%
Gate fidelity decreases exponentially with the number of gates
Decoherence is identified as the primary limit on gate fidelity
Abstract
We present measurements of single-qubit gate errors for a superconducting qubit. Results from quantum process tomography and randomized benchmarking are compared with gate errors obtained from a double pi pulse experiment. Randomized benchmarking reveals a minimum average gate error of 1.1+/-0.3% and a simple exponential dependence of fidelity on the number of gates. It shows that the limits on gate fidelity are primarily imposed by qubit decoherence, in agreement with theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
