Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0810.3247v1] by G. L. Klimchitskaya et al. on "Application of the Lifshitz theory to poor conductors"
Vitaly B. Svetovoy
TL;DR
This paper refutes claims made in a comment criticizing the author's previous work on applying Lifshitz theory to poor conductors, asserting that the criticisms are incorrect or insignificant.
Contribution
The author defends their original application of Lifshitz theory to poor conductors, clarifying misunderstandings and dismissing the criticisms as incorrect or non-essential.
Findings
The claims in the comment are incorrect.
The original paper's conclusions remain valid.
The criticisms are not essential to the theory.
Abstract
It is shown that the claims expressed in the Comment arXiv:0810.3247v1 against my paper Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163603 (2008) [arXiv:0809.3901] are obviously wrong or not essential.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research