The strange history of B functions or how theoretical chemists and mathematicians do (not) interact
Ernst Joachim Weniger

TL;DR
This paper explores the historical development of B functions, emphasizing their mathematical properties and potential to improve molecular integral calculations, highlighting the need for better collaboration between chemistry and mathematics.
Contribution
It provides a historical perspective on B functions and argues for increased interdisciplinary collaboration to advance theoretical chemistry.
Findings
B functions have simple Fourier transforms facilitating molecular integrals.
Historically, chemistry and mathematics have had limited interaction.
Future progress relies on stronger interdisciplinary collaboration.
Abstract
functions are a class of relatively complicated exponentially decaying basis functions. Since the molecular multicenter integrals of the much simpler Slater-type functions are notoriously difficult, it is not at all obvious why functions should offer any advantages. However, functions have Fourier transforms of exceptional simplicity, which greatly simplifies many of their molecular multicenter integrals. This article discusses the historical development of functions from the perspective of the interaction between mathematics and theoretical chemistry, which traditionally has not been very good. Nevertheless, future progress in theoretical chemistry depends very much on a fertile interaction with neighboring disciplines.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
