Epeak estimator for Gamma-Ray Bursts Observed by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope
T. Sakamoto, G. Sato, L. Barbier, S. D. Barthelmy, J. R. Cummings, E., E. Fenimore, N. Gehrels, D. Hullinger, H. A. Krimm, D. Q. Lamb, C. B., Markwardt, D. M. Palmer, A. M. Parsons, M. Stamatikos, J. Tueller, T. N., Ukwatta

TL;DR
This paper presents a new correlation between Epeak and photon index for Swift BAT GRBs, enabling Epeak estimation from simple spectral fits within BAT's energy range, based on extensive spectral simulations.
Contribution
The study introduces an Epeak-b5 relation derived from spectral simulations that accounts for various spectral parameters and burst durations, improving Epeak estimation for BAT GRBs.
Findings
The Epeak-b5 relation is b5 = 3.258 - 0.829b5 for b5 between 1.3 and 2.3.
The correlation is consistent with observed BAT data and other instruments.
Approximately 85% of BAT GRBs can have Epeak estimated using this relation.
Abstract
We report a correlation based on a spectral simulation study of the prompt emission spectra of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT). The correlation is between the Epeak energy, which is the peak energy in the \nu F_\nu spectrum, and the photon index (\Gamma) derived from a simple power-law model. The Epeak - \Gamma relation, assuming the typical smoothly broken power-law spectrum of GRBs, is \log Epeak = 3.258 - 0.829\Gamma (1.3 < \Gamma < 2.3). We take into account not only a range of Epeak energies and fluences, but also distributions for both the low-energy photon index and the high-energy photon index in the smoothly broken power-law model. The distribution of burst durations in the BAT GRB sample is also included in the simulation. Our correlation is consistent with the index observed by BAT and Epeak measured by the BAT, and by other GRB…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
