Radiation pressure force and black hole mass determination in low redshift type-I and type-II active galactic nuclei
Hagai Netzer

TL;DR
This study compares black hole mass estimates in low-redshift AGNs using different methods to assess the impact of radiation pressure, finding it negligible in certain luminosity ranges and implications for broad line region gas physics.
Contribution
It provides an empirical comparison of black hole mass estimates with and without radiation pressure correction in low-redshift AGNs, challenging previous assumptions about radiation pressure effects.
Findings
Virial mass estimates agree with sigma*-based masses in type-II AGNs.
Radiation pressure correction causes discrepancies in Eddington ratio distributions.
Radiation pressure is not significant for AGNs with L(5100) between 10^{42.8} and 10^{44.8} erg/s.
Abstract
The distributions of L(oiii 5007), black hole (BH) mass and L/L(Edd) in two large samples of type-I and type-II active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are compared in order to test the suggestion that radiation pressure force is affecting the gas velocity in the broad line region and hence the BH mass determination. The samples are drawn from the SDSS archive and are modified to represent the same parent distribution at 0.1 < z < 0.2. BH masses in type-I sources are calculated in two different ways, one using a simple virial mass assumption and the other by taking into account the effect of radiation pressure force on the gas. The simple virial mass estimate results in good agreement with the sigma*-based BH mass and L/L(Edd) estimates in type-II sources. In contrast, there is a clear disagreement in the L/L(Edd) distributions when radiation pressure-based estimates are used. This indicates that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
