Reply to the Comment, arXiv:0810.3243v1 by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko
L. P. Pitaevskii

TL;DR
This paper defends a previous publication against criticism, arguing that the criticism is incorrect and conflicts with fundamental principles of statistical physics.
Contribution
It provides a rebuttal demonstrating that the criticisms are invalid and contradict established statistical physics concepts.
Findings
Criticism was shown to be incorrect
Main arguments of the criticism conflict with statistical physics
Reaffirms the validity of the original paper
Abstract
It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical physics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
