B -> phi K*, B -> phi Ks and New Physics
Alakabha Datta, Maxime Imbeault, David London

TL;DR
This paper investigates new physics explanations for anomalies in B meson decays, finding that models with scalar/pseudoscalar operators, like two-Higgs-doublet models, better fit the data than vector/axial-vector models.
Contribution
It analyzes multiple new physics operators to explain polarization and CP violation data in B decays, identifying favored models and proposing future tests.
Findings
Scalar/pseudoscalar operators can explain both decay modes.
Vector/axial-vector models like supersymmetry are insufficient.
Two-Higgs-doublet models are favored for explaining the data.
Abstract
We consider the new-physics (NP) solution to the polarization puzzle in B -> phi K* decays. We note that any such solution must reproduce the data in B -> phi Ks, where there are disagreements with the standard model in CP-asymmetry measurements. We examine 10 NP operators, of S/P, V/A and T variety. We find that, as long as B -> phi Ks exhibits large CP-violating effects, no single operator can explain the observations in both B -> phi K* and B -> phi Ks. For 2-NP-operator solutions, there are four possibilities, all of S/P type, which are presently allowed. We discuss ways of distinguishing among these solutions in the future. Models which contain only V/A operators, such as those with supersymmetry or extra Z' bosons, cannot explain both B -> phi Ks and B -> phi K* data. On the other hand, the two-Higgs-doublet model, which has only S/P operators, is favored.}
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
