Exploring the consequences of pairing algorithms for binary stars
M.B.N. Kouwenhoven (1,2), A.G.A. Brown (3), S.P. Goodwin (1), S.F., Portegies Zwart (2), and L. Kaper (2) ((1) Sheffield, (2) Amsterdam, (3), Leiden)

TL;DR
This paper reviews various pairing algorithms for binary stars, analyzing their impact on interpreting observations and simulations, and emphasizes that simple random pairing is unrealistic, highlighting the importance of formation scenarios.
Contribution
It provides an overview of common pairing functions, discusses their consequences, and offers insights into their implications for stellar population studies and star formation theories.
Findings
Random pairing is unlikely to be realistic.
Binary fraction depends on spectral type range.
Different pairing functions influence interpretation of data.
Abstract
Knowledge of the binary population in stellar groupings provides important information about the outcome of the star forming process in different environments (see, e.g., Blaauw 1991, and references therein). Binarity is also a key ingredient in stellar population studies, and is a prerequisite to calibrate the binary evolution channels. In this paper we present an overview of several commonly used methods to pair individual stars into binary systems, which we refer to as pairing functions. These pairing functions are frequently used by observers and computational astronomers, either for their mathematical convenience, or because they roughly describe the expected outcome of the star forming process. We discuss the consequences of each pairing function for the interpretation of observations and numerical simulations. The binary fraction and mass ratio distribution generally depend…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
