Resolving the discrepancy between lensing and X-ray mass estimates of the complex galaxy cluster Abell 1689
Signe Riemer-Sorensen (1), Danka Paraficz (1), Desiree Della Monica, Ferreira (1), Kristian Pedersen (1), Marceau Limousin (1, 2), Haakon Dahle, (3) ((1) Dark Cosmology Centre, Copenhagen, (2) Laboratoire d'Astrophysique, de Toulouse-Tarbes, (3) University of Oslo)

TL;DR
This study uses combined X-ray and gravitational lensing data to resolve the long-standing mass discrepancy in galaxy cluster Abell 1689, demonstrating consistency when analyzing the main, symmetric cluster component.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed analysis showing that excluding substructure from the X-ray mass estimate aligns it with lensing measurements, resolving previous discrepancies.
Findings
X-ray and lensing mass profiles agree for the main cluster component
Excluding substructure from analysis reduces mass estimate discrepancies
Mass within 875 kpc is approximately 6.4 x 10^14 solar masses from X-rays and 8.6 x 10^14 from lensing
Abstract
There is a long-standing discrepancy between galaxy cluster masses determined from X-ray and gravitational lensing observations of which Abell 1689 is a well-studied example. In this work we take advantage of 180 ks of Chandra X-ray observations and a new weak gravitational study based on a Hubble Space Telescope mosaic covering the central 1.8 Mpc x 1.4 Mpc to eliminate the mass discrepancy. In contrast to earlier X-ray analyses where the very circular surface brightness has been inferred as Abell 1689 being spherically symmetric and in hydrostatic equilibrium, a hardness ratio map analysis reveals a regular and symmetric appearing main clump with a cool core plus some substructure in the North Eastern part of the cluster. The gravitational lensing mass model supports the interpretation of Abell 1689 being composed of a main clump, which is possibly a virialized cluster, plus some…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
