On a damage-plasticity approach to model concrete failure
Peter Grassl

TL;DR
This paper introduces a damage-plasticity model for concrete fracture, comparing local and nonlocal approaches, and discusses their mesh independence and boundary sensitivity in simulating concrete failure.
Contribution
It presents a novel damage-plasticity model for concrete fracture and compares local and nonlocal methods, highlighting their advantages and limitations.
Findings
Both models achieve mesh-independent results.
The nonlocal model shows sensitivity to boundary conditions.
Local and nonlocal approaches are effective for concrete failure analysis.
Abstract
A damage-plasticity constitutive model for the description of fracture in plain concrete is presented. Two approaches, the local model comprising the adjustment of the softening modulus and the nonlocal model based on spatial averaging of history variables, are applied to the analysis of a concrete bar subjected to uniaxial tension and to a three-point bending test. The influence of mesh size and the decomposition into damage and plasticity components are discussed. It is shown that for the two examples studied, both approaches result in mesh-independent results. However, the nonlocal model, which relies on spatial averaging of history variables, exhibits sensitivity with respect to boundary conditions, which requires further studies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNumerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
