HST Morphologies of z~2 Dust Obscured Galaxies I: Power-law Sources
R. S. Bussmann, Arjun Dey, J. Lotz, L. Armus, K. Brand, M. J. I., Brown, V. Desai, P. Eisenhardt, J. Higdon, S. Higdon, B. T. Jannuzi, E. Le, Floc'h, J. Melbourne, B. T. Soifer, D. Weedman

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution Hubble imaging to analyze the morphologies of z~2 Dust Obscured Galaxies, revealing their extended structures, sizes, and potential evolutionary stages, with implications for understanding galaxy formation.
Contribution
First detailed morphological analysis of z~2 Dust Obscured Galaxies using Hubble imaging, highlighting their sizes, structures, and possible post-merger status.
Findings
Most DOGs are spatially extended and not unresolved AGN-dominated.
DOGs have effective radii of 1-6 kpc, smaller than SMGs but larger than quiescent galaxies.
Morphological measures suggest DOGs are more relaxed than local ULIRGs.
Abstract
We present high spatial resolution optical and near-infrared imaging obtained using the ACS, WFPC2 and NICMOS cameras aboard the Hubble Space Telescope of 31 24um--bright z~2 Dust Obscured Galaxies (DOGs) identified in the Bootes Field of the NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey. Although this subset of DOGs have mid-IR spectral energy distributions dominated by a power-law component suggestive of an AGN, all but one of the galaxies are spatially extended and not dominated by an unresolved component at rest-frame UV or optical wavelengths. The observed V-H and I-H colors of the extended components are 0.2-3 magnitudes redder than normal star-forming galaxies. All but 1 have axial ratios >0.3, making it unlikely that DOGs are composed of an edge-on star-forming disk. We model the spatially extended component of the surface brightness distributions of the DOGs with a Sersic profile and find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
