Pairwise maximum entropy models for studying large biological systems: when they can and when they can't work
Yasser Roudi, Sheila Nirenberg, Peter Latham

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of pairwise maximum entropy models in accurately describing large biological systems, revealing limitations in their predictive power depending on system size and crossover points.
Contribution
It demonstrates that pairwise models often fail for large systems and introduces a framework to determine their applicability based on system size and crossover points.
Findings
Pairwise models are often insufficient for large biological systems.
A crossover point determines when pairwise models become predictive.
Most neural systems studied are below the crossover size.
Abstract
One of the most critical problems we face in the study of biological systems is building accurate statistical descriptions of them. This problem has been particularly challenging because biological systems typically contain large numbers of interacting elements, which precludes the use of standard brute force approaches. Recently, though, several groups have reported that there may be an alternate strategy. The reports show that reliable statistical models can be built without knowledge of all the interactions in a system; instead, pairwise interactions can suffice. These findings, however, are based on the analysis of small subsystems. Here we ask whether the observations will generalize to systems of realistic size, that is, whether pairwise models will provide reliable descriptions of true biological systems. Our results show that, in most cases, they will not. The reason is that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
