Gram's Law Fails a Positive Proportion of the Time
Timothy Trudgian

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that Gram's Law, which relates to the zeros of the zeta-function, fails in a positive proportion of intervals, and a weaker version holds in a positive proportion as well.
Contribution
It extends Titchmarsh's work by proving that Gram's Law fails in a positive proportion of intervals and introduces a weaker form that also holds in a positive proportion.
Findings
A positive proportion of Gram intervals violate Gram's Law.
A weaker notion of Gram's Law is valid over a positive proportion of intervals.
The results provide new insights into the distribution of zeros of the zeta-function.
Abstract
This paper extends the work done by Titchmarsh on Gram's Law (an attempt to locate the zeroes of the zeta-function on the critical line). Herewith it is shown that a positive proportion of Gram intervals violate Gram's Law; and also that a weaker notion of Gram's Law is valid over a positive proportion of intervals.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Advanced Mathematical Identities · Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
