On the evolution of the Gamma- and X-ray luminosities of Pulsar Wind Nebulae
Fabio Mattana, Maurizio Falanga, Diego G\"otz, R\'egis Terrier, Paolo, Esposito, Alberto Pellizzoni, Andrea De Luca, Vincent Marandon, Andrea, Goldwurm, Patrizia Caraveo

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between gamma-ray and X-ray emissions in pulsar wind nebulae, revealing empirical relations with pulsar properties that aid in classifying sources and estimating pulsar parameters.
Contribution
It introduces new empirical relations linking gamma-ray to X-ray flux ratios with pulsar spin-down luminosity and age, supporting the relic nebulae hypothesis.
Findings
Gamma-ray to X-ray flux ratio inversely proportional to spin-down luminosity
Flux ratio proportional to pulsar characteristic age
Relations enable estimation of pulsar properties from nebulae observations
Abstract
Pulsar wind nebulae are a prominent class of very high energy (E > 0.1 TeV) Galactic sources. Their Gamma-ray spectra are interpreted as due to inverse Compton scattering of ultrarelativistic electrons on the ambient photons, whereas the X-ray spectra are due to synchrotron emission. We investigate the relation between the Gamma- and-X-ray emission and the pulsars' spin-down luminosity and characteristic age. We find that the distance-independent Gamma- to X-ray flux ratio of the nebulae is inversely proportional to the spin-down luminosity, (\propto \dot{E}^-1.9), while it appears proportional to the characteristic age, (\propto tau_c^2.2), of the parent pulsar. We interpret these results as due to the evolution of the electron energy distribution and the nebular dynamics, supporting the idea of so-called relic pulsar wind nebulae. These empirical relations provide a new tool to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
