Renormalization group evolution of neutrino mixing parameters near $\theta_{13} = 0$ and models with vanishing $\theta_{13}$ at the high scale
Amol Dighe (Tata Inst.), Srubabati Goswami (Ahmedabad, Phys. Res. Lab), and Shamayita Ray (Tata Inst.)

TL;DR
This paper investigates how neutrino mixing angles, especially _{13}, evolve under renormalization group effects near zero, exploring the conditions for generating or maintaining a vanishing _{13} in different models.
Contribution
It introduces a formalism for RG evolution of neutrino parameters that avoids singularities at _{13}=0 and analyzes the fine-tuning needed for _{13} to remain zero during evolution.
Findings
RG evolution can generate non-zero _{13} in models with _{13}=0 at high scale.
Exact _{13}=0 requires extreme fine-tuning during RG evolution.
Constraints relate _{13}, lightest neutrino mass, neutrinoless double beta decay, and .
Abstract
Renormalization group (RG) evolution of the neutrino mass matrix may take the value of the mixing angle very close to zero, or make it vanish. On the other hand, starting from at the high scale it may be possible to generate a non-zero radiatively. In the most general scenario with non-vanishing CP violating Dirac and Majorana phases, we explore the evolution in the vicinity of , in terms of its structure in the complex plane. This allows us to explain the apparent singularity in the evolution of the Dirac CP phase at . We also introduce a formalism for calculating the RG evolution of neutrino parameters that uses the Jarlskog invariant and naturally avoids this singular behaviour. We find that the parameters need to be extremely fine-tuned in order to get exactly vanishing …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
