Scenario Planning and Nanotechnological Futures
Darryl Farber, Akhlesh Lakhtakia

TL;DR
This paper discusses how scenario planning can help guide nanotechnological development by exploring future societal impacts, aiding decision-making, and addressing public perception of risks.
Contribution
It introduces two specific scenarios for nanotechnology's societal impact and emphasizes the role of technoscientists in shaping these futures.
Findings
Two societal impact scenarios: mixed-signals and confluence.
Scenario planning enhances foresight and leadership in nanotech.
Technoscientists play key roles in future societal outcomes.
Abstract
Scenario planning may assist us in harnessing the benefits of nanotechnology and managing the associated risks for the good of the society. Scenario planning is a way to describe the present state of the world and develop several hypotheses about the future of the world, thereby enabling discussions about how the world ought to be. Scenario planning thus is not only a tool for learning and foresight, but also for leadership. Informed decision-making by experts and political leaders becomes possible, while simultaneously allaying public's perception of the risks of new and emerging technologies such as nanotechnology. Two scenarios of the societal impact of nanotechnology are the mixed-signals scenario and the confluence scenario. Technoscientists have major roles to play in both scenarios.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
