Touchscreen Voting Machines Cause Long Lines and Disenfranchise Voters
William A. Edelstein, Arthur D. Edelstein

TL;DR
The paper analyzes how touchscreen voting machines cause long lines and disenfranchisement, suggesting that increasing DREs is costly while paper ballots offer a scalable, economical solution.
Contribution
It applies queuing simulation to voting processes, demonstrating that paper ballots are a more scalable and cost-effective alternative to DREs for preventing long lines.
Findings
DRE voting systems lead to long wait times and voter disenfranchisement.
Significantly increasing DREs is costly and impractical.
Paper ballot-optical scan systems are scalable and economical.
Abstract
Computerized touchscreen "Direct Recording Electronic" DRE voting systems have been used by over 1/3 of American voters in recent elections. In many places, insufficient DRE numbers in combination with lengthy ballots and high voter traffic have caused long lines and disenfranchised voters who left without voting. We have applied computer queuing simulation to the voting process and conclude that far more DREs, at great expense, would be needed to keep waiting times low. Alternatively, paper ballot-optical scan systems can be easily and economically scaled to prevent long lines and meet unexpected contingencies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
