Towards the parameterisation of the Hubbard model for salts of BEDT-TTF: A density functional study of isolated molecules

TL;DR

This study calculates the effective Coulomb repulsion U in isolated BEDT-TTF molecules across various conditions, showing its invariance and implications for modeling the phase behavior of BEDT-TTF salts.

Contribution

It provides a consistent value of U for BEDT-TTF molecules, challenging the assumption that pressure affects U, and highlights the importance of intramolecular and environmental factors in the Hubbard model.

Findings

U is approximately 4.2 eV across diverse geometries

U is much smaller than the bare Coulomb integral F_0

Site energy varies slightly and influences disorder understanding

Abstract

We calculate the effective Coulomb repulsion between electrons/holes, U, and site energy for an isolated BEDT-TTF [bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene] molecule in vacuo. U=4.2 \pm 0.1 eV for 44 experimental geometries taken from a broad range of conformations, polymorphs, anions, temperatures, and pressures (the quoted `error' is one standard deviation). Hence we conclude that U is essentially the same for all of the compounds studied. This shows that the strong (hydrostatic and chemical) pressure dependence observed in the phase diagrams of the BEDT-TTF salts is not due to U. Therefore, if the Hubbard model is sufficient to describe the phase diagram of the BEDT-TTF salts there must be significant pressure dependence on the intramolecular terms in the Hamiltonian and/or the reduction of the Hubbard U due to the interaction of the molecule with the polarisable crystal environment. The renormalised value of U is significantly smaller than the bare value of the Coulomb integral: F_0=5.2\pm0.1 eV across the same set of geometries, emphasising the importance of using the renormalised value of U. The site energy (for holes), xi=5.0\pm0.2 eV, varies only a little more than U across the same set of geometries. However, we argue that this plays a key role in understanding the role of disorder in ET salts in general and in explaining the difference between the beta_L and beta_H phases of beta-(BEDT-TTF)_2I_3 in particular.