Quantization of the Myers-Pospelov model: the photon sector interacting with standard fermions as a perturbation of QED
C. M. Reyes, L. F. Urrutia, J. D. Vergara

TL;DR
This paper develops a perturbative effective field theory for the photon sector of the Myers-Pospelov model coupled to fermions, ensuring it reduces to QED when Lorentz violation parameters are zero, with minimal causality and stability issues.
Contribution
It introduces a physically motivated prescription for constructing a Lorentz-violating effective theory as a perturbation of QED, including a new energy scale and detailed radiative correction analysis.
Findings
Lorentz-violating contributions are highly suppressed in electron self-energy corrections.
Microcausality violations are negligible and occur near the light-cone.
Model stability is maintained within specific velocity constraints.
Abstract
We study the quantization of the electromagnetic sector of the Myers-Pospelov model coupled to standard fermions. Our main objective, based upon experimental and observational evidence, is to construct an effective theory which is a genuine perturbation of QED, such that setting zero the Lorentz invariance violation parameters will reproduce it. To this end we provide a physically motivated prescription, based on the effective character of the model, regarding the way in which the model should be constructed and how the QED limit should be approached. This amounts to the introduction of an additional coarse-graining physical energy scale , under which we can trust the effective field theory formulation. The prescription is successfully tested in the calculation of the Lorentz invariance violating contributions arising from the electron self-energy. Such radiative corrections turn out…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
