The norm game - how a norm fails
Krzysztof Kulakowski, Antoni Dydejczyk

TL;DR
This paper models how social norms can fail using a norm game on a network, revealing how punishment, its cost, and network structure influence norm stability and failure.
Contribution
It introduces a simulation of the norm game on directed networks, analyzing how punishment and network effects impact norm persistence and failure.
Findings
Threshold initial boldness determines norm failure
Punishment increases norm resilience, but with diminishing returns
Network structure influences the likelihood of norm collapse
Abstract
We discuss the simulations of the norm game between players at nodes of a directed random network. The final boldness of the players can vary with the initial one as the function. One of the conditions of this behaviour is that the player who does not punish automatically becomes a defector. The threshold value of the initial boldness can be interpreted as a norm strength. It increases with the punishment and decreases with its cost. Surprisingly, it also decreases with the number of potential punishers. The numerical results are discussed in the context of the statistical data on crimes in Northern Ireland and New Zealand, on divorces in USA, and on the alcohol consumption in Poland.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Game Theory and Applications · Complex Network Analysis Techniques
