Comment on "Spin and Orbital Angular Momentum in Gauge Theories" by X. S. Chen et. al. (PRL100, 232002 (2008))
Xiangdong Ji

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a proposed decomposition of angular momentum in gauge theories, highlighting fundamental issues with its mathematical consistency, gauge dependence, Lorentz properties, and physical measurability.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique showing that the proposed angular momentum operators are non-local, gauge-dependent, and lack proper Lorentz transformation properties.
Findings
The operators do not satisfy canonical angular momentum commutation rules.
They are generally non-local in gauge theories.
They lack known physical measurement procedures.
Abstract
The individual parts of the total angular momentum operator in interacting theories cannot satisfy the canonical angular momentum commutation rule, including those proposed in the above paper. Furthermore, the operators in the new proposal a) are non-local in general gauge, b) do not have proper Lorentz transformation properties, and c) do not have any known physical measurements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
