The adaptability of physiological systems optimizes performance: new directions in augmentation
Bradly Alicea

TL;DR
This paper critiques traditional augmented cognition models and introduces complex systems and physiology concepts to better understand and optimize human performance in human-machine interfaces.
Contribution
It introduces a multidimensional fitness landscape model and a four-step approach for characterizing complex physiological and behavioral systems.
Findings
Comparison of Gaussian and fitness landscape models
Proposal of a four-step model for multivariate systems
Advocacy for an alternative design approach in human-machine systems
Abstract
This paper contributes to the human-machine interface community in two ways: as a critique of the closed-loop AC (augmented cognition) approach, and as a way to introduce concepts from complex systems and systems physiology into the field. Of particular relevance is a comparison of the inverted-U (or Gaussian) model of optimal performance and multidimensional fitness landscape model. Hypothetical examples will be given from human physiology and learning and memory. In particular, a four-step model will be introduced that is proposed as a better means to characterize multivariate systems during behavioral processes with complex dynamics such as learning. Finally, the alternate approach presented herein is considered as a preferable design alternate in human-machine systems. It is within this context that future directions are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGene Regulatory Network Analysis · Mental Health Research Topics · Complex Systems and Decision Making
