A constructive proof of the Lovasz Local Lemma

TL;DR

This paper presents a new randomized algorithm that constructively finds satisfying assignments for certain k-CNF formulas, improving previous bounds and providing a direct, constructive proof of the Lovasz Local Lemma.

Contribution

It offers the first constructive, randomized algorithm for the Local Lemma with near-optimal neighborhood bounds, avoiding non-constructive methods used previously.

Findings

Algorithm finds satisfying assignments in expected polynomial time

Achieves near-optimal neighborhood size of 2^(k-5)-1 clauses

Provides a constructive proof of the Lovasz Local Lemma

Abstract

The Lovasz Local Lemma [EL75] is a powerful tool to prove the existence of combinatorial objects meeting a prescribed collection of criteria. The technique can directly be applied to the satisfiability problem, yielding that a k-CNF formula in which each clause has common variables with at most 2^(k-2) other clauses is always satisfiable. All hitherto known proofs of the Local Lemma are non-constructive and do thus not provide a recipe as to how a satisfying assignment to such a formula can be efficiently found. In his breakthrough paper [Bec91], Beck demonstrated that if the neighbourhood of each clause be restricted to O(2^(k/48)), a polynomial time algorithm for the search problem exists. Alon simplified and randomized his procedure and improved the bound to O(2^(k/8)) [Alo91]. Srinivasan presented in [Sri08] a variant that achieves a bound of essentially O(2^(k/4)). In [Mos08], we improved this to O(2^(k/2)). In the present paper, we give a randomized algorithm that finds a satisfying assignment to every k-CNF formula in which each clause has a neighbourhood of at most the asymptotic optimum of 2^(k-5)-1 other clauses and that runs in expected time polynomial in the size of the formula, irrespective of k. If k is considered a constant, we can also give a deterministic variant. In contrast to all previous approaches, our analysis does not anymore invoke the standard non-constructive versions of the Local Lemma and can therefore be considered an alternative, constructive proof of it.