The Yoneda algebra of a K_2 algebra need not be another K_2 algebra
Thomas Cassidy, Christopher Phan, Brad Shelton

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the Yoneda algebra of a K_2 algebra does not always retain the K_2 property, challenging assumptions about their structural preservation.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample showing that the Yoneda algebra of a K_2 algebra need not be K_2, unlike Koszul algebras.
Findings
Constructed a monomial K_2 algebra with a non-K_2 Yoneda algebra
Challenged the expectation that Yoneda algebras of K_2 algebras are always K_2
Provided insights into the limitations of K_2 algebra properties
Abstract
The Yoneda algebra of a Koszul algebra or a D-Koszul algebra is Koszul. K_2 algebras are a natural generalization of Koszul algebras, and one would hope that the Yoneda algebra of a K_2 algebra would be another K_2 algebra. We show that this is not necessarily the case by constructing a monomial K_2 algebra for which the corresponding Yoneda algebra is not K_2.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
