
TL;DR
This paper explores properties of open maps between shift spaces, establishing conditions under which openness, closeness, and constant-to-one mappings imply each other, especially in the context of sofic shifts.
Contribution
It proves a new equivalence between openness, closeness, and constant-to-one properties for maps from shift spaces to irreducible sofic shifts, including bi-closing cases.
Findings
Open maps imply the other properties under certain conditions.
Closing open or constant-to-one extensions preserve sofic shift structure.
Results extend to non-sofic ranges with bi-closingness.
Abstract
Given a code from a shift space to an irreducible sofic shift, any two of the following three conditions -- open, constant-to-one, (right or left) closing -- imply the third. If the range is not sofic, then the same result holds when bi-closingness replaces closingness. Properties of open mappings between shift spaces are investigated in detail. In particular, we show that a closing open (or constant-to-one) extension preserves the structure of a sofic shift.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
