Dynamical Simulations of Magnetically Channeled Line-Driven Stellar Winds: III. Angular Momentum Loss and Rotational Spindown
Asif ud-Doula (SUNY-Morrisville State College), Stanley P. Owocki, (Univ of DE), Richard H.D. Townsend (Univ of Wisconsin-MAdison)

TL;DR
This study models how magnetic hot stars lose angular momentum through stellar winds, revealing that dipole magnetic fields cause a slower spindown than previously estimated by monopole models, with implications for stellar evolution.
Contribution
It provides a detailed 2-D numerical analysis of angular momentum loss in magnetic hot stars with dipole fields, contrasting it with classical monopole models and deriving new scaling relations.
Findings
Angular momentum loss closely follows Weber-Davis scaling.
Dipole fields lead to a weaker dependence of Alfvén radius on magnetic confinement.
Typical spindown times are around 1 million years for observed magnetic massive stars.
Abstract
We examine the angular momentum loss and associated rotational spindown for magnetic hot stars with a line-driven stellar wind and a rotation-aligned dipole magnetic field. Our analysis here is based on our previous 2-D numerical MHD simulation study that examines the interplay among wind, field, and rotation as a function of two dimensionless parameters, one characterizing the wind magnetic confinement (), and the other the ratio () of stellar rotation to critical (orbital) speed. We compare and contrast the 2-D, time variable angular momentum loss of this dipole model of a hot-star wind with the classical 1-D steady-state analysis by Weber and Davis (WD), who used an idealized monopole field to model the angular momentum loss in the solar wind. Despite the differences, we find that the total…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
