Effects of the higher partial waves and relativistic terms on the accuracy of the calculation of the hypertriton electroproduction
T. Mart

TL;DR
This study evaluates the impact of higher partial waves and relativistic terms on hypertriton electroproduction calculations, showing that simplified models with minimal partial waves and relativistic terms can still achieve high accuracy with significantly reduced computational time.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that using only the three lowest partial waves and including relativistic terms yields accurate hypertriton electroproduction results, optimizing computational efficiency.
Findings
Using three lowest partial waves yields ~4% deviation from full calculation.
Omitting relativistic terms causes large deviations in results.
Computational time reduced by a factor of 60 with simplified model.
Abstract
We have investigated the accuracies of calculations made by omitting the higher partial waves of nuclear wave functions and the elementary relativistic terms in the hypertriton electroproduction. We found that an accurate calculation would still be obtained if we used at least three lowest partial waves with isospin T = 0. Furthermore, we found that the omission of the relativistic terms in the elementary process amplitude could lead to a large deviation from the full calculation. We also present the cpu-times required to calculate the cross sections. For future consideration the use of these lowest partial waves is suggested, since the calculated cross section deviates only about 0.17 nb/sr (approximately 4%), at most, from the full calculation, whereas the cpu-time is reduced by a factor of 60. Comparison of our result with the available experimental data supports these findings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
