(Non)Automaticity of number theoretic functions
Michael Coons

TL;DR
This paper proves that Liouville's function and several other number-theoretic functions are not automatic and their generating functions are transcendental over finite fields, using classical prime distribution results.
Contribution
It establishes the non-automaticity of Liouville's function and related functions, and shows their generating functions are transcendental over finite fields.
Findings
Liouville's function is not k-automatic for any k>2.
The generating series of these functions are transcendental over _p(X).
Results apply to multiple classical number-theoretic functions.
Abstract
Denote by Liouville's function concerning the parity of the number of prime divisors of . Using a theorem of Allouche, Mend\`es France, and Peyri\`ere and many classical results from the theory of the distribution of prime numbers, we prove that is not --automatic for any . This yields that is transcendental over for any prime . Similar results are proven (or reproven) for many common number--theoretic functions, including , , , , , and others.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
