Comment on "Thermal Lifshitz force between an atom and a conductor with a small density of carriers"
B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a generalized Lifshitz theory for atom-conductor interactions, revealing violations of thermodynamic principles and inconsistencies with experimental data for many dielectrics.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Pitaevskii's generalized Lifshitz theory violates the Nernst heat theorem and conflicts with experimental results for dielectric materials.
Findings
Violates the Nernst heat theorem for many dielectrics
Inconsistent with experimental data
Challenges the validity of the generalized Lifshitz theory
Abstract
We demonstrate that the generalization of the Lifshitz theory proposed by L. P. Pitaevskii arXiv:0801.0656 [Phys. Rev. Lett. v.101, 163202 (2008)] violates the Nernst heat theorem for many dielectric materials and is experimentally inconsistent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
